Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator


  • 1.

    Preskill, J. Quantum computing within the NISQ period and past. Quantum 2, 79 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Zhang, J. et al. Commentary of a many-body dynamical section transition with a 53-qubit quantum simulator. Nature 551, 601–604 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Gross, C. & Bloch, I. Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Science 357, 995–1001 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Choi, J.-y. et al. Exploring the many-body localization transition in two dimensions. Science 352, 1547–1552 (2016).

    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Mazurenko, A. et al. A chilly-atom Fermi–Hubbard antiferromagnet. Nature 545, 462–466 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Bernien, H. et al. Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator. Nature 551, 579–584 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Neill, C. et al. Precisely computing digital properties of a quantum ring. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.00921v2 (2021).

  • 8.

    Wang, C. S. et al. Environment friendly multiphoton sampling of molecular vibronic spectra on a superconducting bosonic processor. Phys. Rev. X 10, 021060 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy utilizing a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Zhong, H.-S. et al. Quantum computational benefit utilizing photons. Science 370, 1460–1463 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S. & Maccone, L. Advances in quantum metrology. Nat. Photon. 5, 222–229 (2011).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Browaeys, A. & Lahaye, T. Many-body physics with individually managed Rydberg atoms. Nat. Phys. 16, 132–142 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Sachdev, S. Quantum Section Transitions 2nd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011).

  • 14.

    Samajdar, R., Ho, W. W., Pichler, H., Lukin, M. D. & Sachdev, S. Complicated density wave orders and quantum section transitions in a mannequin of square-lattice Rydberg atom arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 103601 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Pagano, G. et al. Quantum approximate optimization of the long-range Ising mannequin with a trapped-ion quantum simulator. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 25396–25401 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Friis, N. et al. Commentary of entangled states of a totally managed 20-qubit system. Phys. Rev. X 8, 021012 (2018).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Harris, R. et al. Section transitions in a programmable quantum spin glass simulator. Science 361, 162–165 (2018).

    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Labuhn, H. et al. Tunable two-dimensional arrays of single Rydberg atoms for realizing quantum Ising fashions. Nature 534, 667–670 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Morgado, M. & Whitlock, S. Quantum simulation and computing with Rydberg qubits. AVS Quantum Sci. 3, 023501 (2021).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Lienhard, V. et al. Observing the space- and time-dependent development of correlations in dynamically tuned artificial Ising fashions with antiferromagnetic interactions. Phys. Rev. X 8, 021070 (2018).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Guardado-Sanchez, E. et al. Probing the quench dynamics of antiferromagnetic correlations in a 2D quantum Ising spin system. Phys. Rev. X 8, 021069 (2018).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Kim, H., Park, Y., Kim, Ok., Sim, H.-S. & Ahn, J. Detailed stability of thermalization dynamics in Rydberg-atom quantum simulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 180502 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    de Léséleuc, S. et al. Commentary of a symmetry-protected topological section of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms. Science 365, 775–780 (2019).

    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Keesling, A. et al. Quantum Kibble–Zurek mechanism and demanding dynamics on a programmable Rydberg simulator. Nature 568, 207–211 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Madjarov, I. S. et al. Excessive-fidelity entanglement and detection of alkaline-earth Rydberg atoms. Nat. Phys. 16, 857–861 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Omran, A. et al. Era and manipulation of Schrödinger cat states in Rydberg atom arrays. Science 365, 570–574 (2019).

    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Graham, T. M. et al. Rydberg mediated entanglement in a two-dimensional impartial atom qubit array. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 230501 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Levine, H. et al. Parallel implementation of high-fidelity multiqubit gates with impartial atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 170503 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Madjarov, I. S. et al. An atomic-array optical clock with single-atom readout. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041052 (2019).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Younger, A. W. et al. Half-minute-scale atomic coherence and excessive relative stability in a tweezer clock. Nature 588, 408–413 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Schymik, Ok.-N. et al. Enhanced atom-by-atom meeting of arbitrary tweezers arrays. Phys. Rev. A 102, 063107 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Kumar, A., Wu, T.-Y., Giraldo, F. & Weiss, D. S. Sorting ultracold atoms in a three-dimensional optical lattice in a realization of Maxwell’s demon. Nature 561, 83–87 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Ohl de Mello, D. et al. Defect-free meeting of 2D clusters of greater than 100 single-atom quantum techniques. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 203601 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Barredo, D., Lienhard, V., de Léséleuc, S., Lahaye, T. & Browaeys, A. Artificial three-dimensional atomic constructions assembled atom by atom. Nature 561, 79–82 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Barredo, D., de Léséleuc, S., Lienhard, V., Lahaye, T. & Browaeys, A. An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary 2D atomic arrays. Science 354, 1021–1023 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Jaksch, D. et al. Quick quantum gates for impartial atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2208 (2000).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Lukin, M. D. et al. Dipole blockade and quantum data processing in mesoscopic atomic ensembles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037901 (2001).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Gardas, B., Dziarmaga, J., Zurek, W. H. & Zwolak, M. Defects in quantum computer systems. Sci. Rep. 8, 4539 (2018).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Zurek, W. H., Dorner, U. & Zoller, P. Dynamics of a quantum section transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 105701 (2005).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Felser, T., Notarnicola, S. & Montangero, S. Environment friendly tensor community ansatz for high-dimensional quantum many-body issues. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 170603 (2021).

    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R. & Preskill, J. Predicting many properties of a quantum system from only a few measurements. Nat. Phys. 16, 1050–1057 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Verresen, R., Lukin, M. D. & Vishwanath, A. Prediction of toric code topological order from Rydberg blockade. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.12310 (2020).

  • 43.

    Samajdar, R., Ho, W. W., Pichler, H., Lukin, M. D. & Sachdev, S. Quantum phases of Rydberg atoms on a kagome lattice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2015785118 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Semeghini, G. et al. Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.04119 (2021).

  • 45.

    Saskin, S., Wilson, J. T., Grinkemeyer, B. & Thompson, J. D. Slender-line cooling and imaging of ytterbium atoms in an optical tweezer array. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 143002 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    Anderegg, L. et al. An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules. Science 365, 1156–1158 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Liu, L. R. et al. Constructing one molecule from a reservoir of two atoms. Science 360, 900–903 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    Turner, C. J., Michailidis, A. A., Abanin, D. A., Serbyn, M. & Papić, Z. Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars. Nat. Phys. 14, 745–749 (2018).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 49.

    Surace, F. M. et al. Lattice gauge theories and string dynamics in Rydberg atom quantum simulators. Phys. Rev. X 10, 021041 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 50.

    Bluvstein, D. et al. Controlling quantum many-body dynamics in pushed Rydberg atom arrays. Science 371, 1355–1359 (2021).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 51.

    Diehl, H. W. The idea of boundary important phenomena. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 11, 3503–3523 (1997).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 52.

    Bañuls, M. C. et al. Simulating lattice gauge theories inside quantum applied sciences. Eur. Phys. J. D 74, 165 (2020).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 53.

    Notarnicola, S., Collura, M. & Montangero, S. Actual-time-dynamics quantum simulation of (1 + 1)-dimensional lattice QED with Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. Analysis 2, 013288 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 54.

    Weimer, H., Müller, M., Lesanovsky, I., Zoller, P. & Büchler, H. P. A Rydberg quantum simulator. Nat. Phys. 6, 382–388 (2010).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 55.

    Auger, J. M., Bergamini, S. & Browne, D. E. Blueprint for fault-tolerant quantum computation with Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. A 96, 052320 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 56.

    Farhi, E., Goldstone, J. & Gutmann, S. A quantum approximate optimization algorithm. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4028 (2014).

  • 57.

    Zhou, L., Wang, S.-T., Choi, S., Pichler, H. & Lukin, M. D. Quantum approximate optimization algorithm: efficiency, mechanism, and implementation on near-term units. Phys. Rev. X 10, 021067 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 58.

    Wild, D. S., Sels, D., Pichler, H. & Lukin, M. D. Quantum sampling algorithms for near-term units. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14059 (2020).

  • 59.

    Scholl, P. et al. Programmable quantum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with lots of of Rydberg atoms. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03585-1 (2021).

  • 60.

    Kim, D. et al. Massive-scale uniform optical focus array era with a section spatial mild modulator. Choose. Lett. 44, 3178–3181 (2019).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 61.

    Endres, M. et al. Atom-by-atom meeting of defect-free one-dimensional chilly atom arrays. Science 354, 1024–1027 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 62.

    Lee, W., Kim, H. & Ahn, J. Defect-free atomic array formation utilizing the Hungarian matching algorithm. Phys. Rev. A 95, 053424 (2017).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 63.

    Sheng, C. et al. Environment friendly preparation of 2D defect-free atom arrays with near-fewest sorting-atom strikes. Phys. Rev. Analysis 3, 023008 (2021).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 64.

    Levine, H. et al. Excessive-fidelity management and entanglement of Rydberg-atom qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 123603 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 65.

    Bowman, D. et al. Excessive-fidelity section and amplitude management of phase-only pc generated holograms utilizing conjugate gradient minimisation. Choose. Specific 25, 11692–11700 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 66.

    Zupancic, P. et al. Extremely-precise holographic beam shaping for microscopic quantum management. Choose. Specific 24, 13881–13893 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 67.

    Beterov, I. I., Ryabtsev, I. I., Tretyakov, D. B. & Entin, V. M. Quasiclassical calculations of blackbody-radiation-induced depopulation charges and efficient lifetimes of Rydberg nS, nP, and nD alkali-metal atoms with n ≤ 80. Phys. Rev. A 79, 052504 (2009).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 68.

    Bhattacharjee, S. M. & Seno, F. A measure of information collapse for scaling. J. Phys. Math. Gen. 34, 6375 (2001).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 69.

    Hasenbusch, M. Monte Carlo research of floor important phenomena: The particular level. Phys. Rev. B 84, 134405 (2011).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 70.

    White, S. R. Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization teams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 71.

    White, S. R. Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization teams. Phys. Rev. B 48, 10345 (1993).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 72.

    Stoudenmire, E. M. & White, S. R. Finding out two-dimensional techniques with the density matrix renormalization group. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 3, 111–128 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 73.

    Fishman, M., White, S. R. & Stoudenmire, E. M. The ITensor software program library for tensor community calculations. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.14822 (2020).



  • Supply hyperlink

    Leave a Reply

    %d bloggers like this: